-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Finance: Alternatives for use outside PPPs #79
Comments
There are several fields specific to PPP arrangements (e.g. |
A similar need came up in Belarus where the following additional fields were added:
Helpdesk feedback was to provide this information in |
Noting that the finance extension was designed to represent individual financing agreements related to funding a PPP project (my understanding is that basically means funding arrangements for the company set up for the project), hence why few of the other fields in the finance extension are applicable to the use case of describing whether the funding for a procurement is from public, private or donor funds. On that basis I think we should also consider whether a simple codelist field added to either |
Belarus actually has more detail than stated above on the finance source for contracts, with the following codelist for
|
Seems like we might use a pattern like |
We should also add an example of how to use the extension for a process outside PPPs and in the planning section. (CRM-7129) |
The financeType.csv codelist should have options for public/government funding and for donor funding. If the donor is known to be a bilateral or multilateral organization, then those codes can be used, but if not, we need a more generic code.
@duncandewhurst: Can you provide feedback on these proposed changes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: