You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the UK, some procurement processes under the same legislation have different rules depending on the buyer, items, etc. For example, if they are part of a "special regime" or "above threshold".
Currently, there is no standard way of disclosing these rules.
One option to model this is to change the legalBasis object to something else instead of a Classification object (since the special regime and thresholds are specific to the legal basis)
Also, instead of adding fields directly to the tender object (e.g., tender.crossBorderLaw) we could group them in a new tender.legal object that has tender.legal.basis and something else.
In the UK, some procurement processes under the same legislation have different rules depending on the buyer, items, etc. For example, if they are part of a "special regime" or "above threshold".
Currently, there is no standard way of disclosing these rules.
One option to model this is to change the
legalBasis
object to something else instead of a Classification object (since the special regime and thresholds are specific to the legal basis)Also, instead of adding fields directly to the tender object (e.g.,
tender.crossBorderLaw
) we could group them in a newtender.legal
object that hastender.legal.basis
and something else.Originally discussed as part of CRM-8513
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: