-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
prepare: Options for datasets without bids (e.g. R025) #46
Comments
This will be relevant for SERCOP, since only about about 50k of 2M procedures have bids. |
Note: SERCOP only has bids for electronic auctions |
Noting SERCOP has /bids/details for 84% of Menor Cuantía. SERCOP sets tenderers but not bids (in any location) in 19,888 procedures, all of which are Menor Cuantía (selective).
There are 118,996 Menor Cuantía procedures in total
|
Cc' my answer from slack. I don't think this would be relevant for menor cuantía, since its invitation only to one qualified bidder. Menor Cuantía is not an open method, It’s mapped to selective. So its invitation only, and there should only be one bidder, so I don’t think the indicator applies in this case. |
Let's continue on Slack, because most of that doesn't match the data (there are frequently multiple bidders, selective doesn't mean invitation only – it means there is a qualification stage). |
Having read that page, there is something wrong with their data. They should not have up to hundreds of "tenderers" for a procedure with a single tenderer. Anyway, I will not implement the |
For R025 (Excessive unsuccessful bids), can consider filling in
bids/details
according totender/tenderers
, making the assumption thatstatus
is 'valid' and that each tenderer submitted a separate bid.From discussion:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: