Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have a clear report of the extraction process #246

Closed
vlaci opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Have a clear report of the extraction process #246

vlaci opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@vlaci
Copy link
Contributor

vlaci commented Feb 8, 2022

It should be different from the logs. Log information should go to a file by default. A human readable summary should be displayed on the standard output.

We want to have different outputs:

  • reporting (summary of extraction, valid, invalid chunks etc.)
  • logs (already there, but should be written in the file)
  • metadata (extracted file info, information on the content) -> Metadata file #16

Scope of this ticket:

  • console report of identified chunks and encountered errors
    • summary (aggregated results)
    • amount of valid (by type) & unknown chunks (also the size of the chunks)
      • number of extracted files by type
      • depth of the chunks
      • hints on unknown chunk (eg: encrypted)
    • any error we encountered during handling & extraction
    • have a non-configurable output by default and we can change it later if we feel it is too verbose
  • store the logs in a file as well instead of dumping log messages to the console (should be configurable)
@martonilles
Copy link
Contributor

We want to have different outputs:

  • reporting (summary of extraction, valid, invalid chunks etc.)
  • logs
  • metadata (extracted file info, information on the content)

@qkaiser
Copy link
Contributor

qkaiser commented Aug 11, 2023

Fixed by #567

@qkaiser qkaiser closed this as completed Aug 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants