Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues/8607/review missed #9259

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Sancharisingh
Copy link

@Sancharisingh Sancharisingh commented Nov 30, 2024

Proposed Changes

  • Fixes Review Missed #8607
  • Change 1: In the ManagePatients.tsx file, I added a condition that displays:
    Time left for review if the review is upcoming.
    Missed since [X] days if the review time has passed
  • Change 2
  • More?

@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers

Merge Checklist

  • Add specs that demonstrate bug / test a new feature.
  • Update product documentation.
  • Ensure that UI text is kept in I18n files.
  • Prep screenshot or demo video for changelog entry, and attach it to issue.
Screenshot 2024-11-30 at 8 02 25 PM
  • Request for Peer Reviews
  • Completion of QA

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced patient review notifications with clearer status indicators, showing missed reviews or upcoming due dates.
  • Chores

    • Removed commented-out code in the Manage Patients component for a cleaner codebase.
  • Dependencies

    • Updated the xlsx package retrieval method to a direct URL for improved package management.

@Sancharisingh Sancharisingh requested a review from a team as a code owner November 30, 2024 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes changes to the package.json file, where the dependency for the xlsx package has been updated from a version range to a direct URL pointing to a tarball. Additionally, the ManagePatients.tsx component has been modified to improve the display of patient review notifications, providing clearer information on whether a review is missed or due soon, along with the number of days since the review was missed or until it is due.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated xlsx dependency from "^0.18.5" to "https://cdn.sheetjs.com/xlsx-0.20.3/xlsx-0.20.3.tgz"
src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx Enhanced patient review notification logic to display relative time for missed reviews and removed commented-out code.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Enable user to understand when a review was missed (related to #8607)
Allow sorting of patients based on duration since review is missed (related to #8607) Sorting functionality was not implemented in this PR.
Show relative time since review missed in the patient list (related to #8607)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

needs review, tested, P1

Suggested reviewers

  • rithviknishad
  • Jacobjeevan

Poem

In a world of patients, clear and bright,
Missed reviews now shine with light.
Days since missed, a tale to tell,
Helping doctors serve patients well.
With each update, we hop and cheer,
For clarity in care is finally here! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b47daad
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-ohc/deploys/674b2256da4f340008be84bf
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9259--care-ohc.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx (1)

642-658: Consider using i18n for review notification text

The implementation nicely handles both missed and upcoming reviews with clear time indicators. However, the text strings should be internationalized for consistency.

Consider using i18n translations:

-                            ? `Review Missed (${Math.abs(dayjs().diff(dayjs(patient.review_time), "days"))} days ago)`
-                            : `Review Due in (${Math.abs(dayjs(patient.review_time).diff(dayjs(), "days"))} days)`
+                            ? t("review_missed_days_ago", {
+                                days: Math.abs(dayjs().diff(dayjs(patient.review_time), "days"))
+                              })
+                            : t("review_due_in_days", {
+                                days: Math.abs(dayjs(patient.review_time).diff(dayjs(), "days"))
+                              })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8118ccf and b47daad.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Patient/ManagePatients.tsx (1)

Line range hint 631-641: LGTM! Good cleanup of commented code.

Removing commented-out code improves code maintainability.

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
"tailwind-merge": "^2.5.4",
"tailwindcss-animate": "^1.0.7",
"use-keyboard-shortcut": "^1.1.6",
"xlsx": "^0.18.5"
"xlsx": "https://cdn.sheetjs.com/xlsx-0.20.3/xlsx-0.20.3.tgz"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using npm registry version instead of CDN URL

Using a direct CDN URL for the xlsx package raises several concerns:

  1. Security risks as CDN URLs can be compromised
  2. Potential availability issues if CDN is down
  3. Harder version tracking and updates
  4. Build reproducibility issues if URL becomes unavailable

Replace the CDN URL with a version from npm registry:

-    "xlsx": "https://cdn.sheetjs.com/xlsx-0.20.3/xlsx-0.20.3.tgz"
+    "xlsx": "^0.20.3"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"xlsx": "https://cdn.sheetjs.com/xlsx-0.20.3/xlsx-0.20.3.tgz"
"xlsx": "^0.20.3"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review Missed
1 participant