Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ITI47: omissions are not necessarily restrictions #436

Open
qligier opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

ITI47: omissions are not necessarily restrictions #436

qligier opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
ihe

Comments

@qligier
Copy link
Contributor

qligier commented Dec 12, 2023

In ITI-47 (PDQV3 Query), some elements (like birthPlace) are "omitted", while they are authorized (explicitly listed) in ITI-44 (PIX Feed).
CP-ITI-1293 has been filled to clarify the profile on that subject.

IPF has implemented these "omissions" as restrictions. If the CP is accepted in its current form, we can remove these restrictions.
Relevant schematron: https://github.com/oehf/ipf/blob/master/commons/ihe/hl7v3/src/main/resources/schematron/iti47/PRPA_IN201306UV02.sch.xml#L42-L49
@unixoid
Copy link
Member

unixoid commented Dec 12, 2023

Hi Quentin
I have nothing against re-inclusion of patient demographic attributes like BirthPlace, but have a question regarding the query parameters in section 3.47.4.2.2.2, e.g. ExecutionAndDeliveryTime, SortControl, MatchWeight, etc.: Does their re-activation mean that the server (the PIX Manager) shall respect them? Is this additional functionality really desired?

@unixoid unixoid added the ihe label Dec 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ihe
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@unixoid @qligier