Skip to content

Conversation

@tomsail
Copy link
Contributor

@tomsail tomsail commented Oct 7, 2025

more robust indexing based on @jurjendejong suggestions

  • fixed indexing of node / plan for lazyly loaded arrays
  • added test to compare lazyly against eagerly loaded arrays

@tomsail tomsail merged commit b169d60 into main Oct 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@tomsail tomsail deleted the jurjendejong branch October 8, 2025 08:43
@jurjendejong
Copy link

@tomsail ! I see you choose to use the .squeeze() suggestion. I had reverted this suggestion in a later commit, because I realised that .isel(plan=1) and .isel(plan=[1]) should not give the same squeezing. Did you check this behaviour?

@tomsail
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomsail commented Oct 14, 2025

Thanks @jurjendejong for following up.
Indeed I tried your test and it failed

I will implement a fix a add to the tests too.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants