-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Legacy plugin not compatible #20
Comments
This is very likely an issue with Vite I'm assuming this is some kind of a mistake either in Vite or in the Legacy plugin. While I can "fix" this, I want to be sure that it's intentional on Vite's end to change the name of this polyfill. Prefacing it with the Unicode character for |
Yes I was unsure which end this bug needs to be resolved on. After seeing the issue on |
Yeah I commented on that issue -> ElMassimo/vite_ruby#156 (comment) My spidey-sense is telling me that this is actually a bug, it's pretty unlikely they'd randomly decide to prefix virtual modules with the Unicode for |
Fixed via this PR (which is not yet merged, but I'm assuming will be): |
Fixed in Vite 2.7.6, just released -> https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/v2.7.6/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md |
Describe the bug
In vite 2.7, the name of the legacy-polyfills entry has changed from "vite/legacy-polyfills" to "\u0000vite/legacy-polyfills" which seems to be causing issues loading the legacy polyfill file.
This issue is discussed in both vitejs/vite#6097 and ElMassimo/vite_ruby#156
Versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: