Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CooliPi 4B with fan on #47

Closed
CooliPi opened this issue Nov 17, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #51
Closed

CooliPi 4B with fan on #47

CooliPi opened this issue Nov 17, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #51

Comments

@CooliPi
Copy link

CooliPi commented Nov 17, 2019

P1470212s
out-fan_on

CooliPi-fan_on.zip

Hi,

the length of the test (5 minutes ?) is way too short. It takes half an hour for the temperature to settle. See https://www.coolipi.com/Performance.html
I also miss ambient temperature, because you can't make a fair comparison if you don't know it.

Mine was 25.5-26 degC. Raspberry Pi 4 model B. Overclocked to 1850MHz, over_voltage=2
GPU wasn't intentionally overclocked. Monitor - 1920x1200 via HDMI.

The best stress test isn't stress or stress-ng, but linpack. At least for Raspberry Pi 4.

I've also noticed different cooling performance with a monitor connected and then without a monitor. 4K monitor would make the device heat up even more.

So I suggest you also require these metadata.

CooliPi 4B is primarily a passive heatsink with a case, this setup is mainly for industrial users and for overclockers.

Best Regards.

Lada ([email protected])

@CooliPi
Copy link
Author

CooliPi commented Dec 1, 2019

I've also found out differences in temperature with different RPI firmwares. The latest one slashes some more degrees of temperature. So I suggest you also collect the firmware version. Not sure how many Celsius degrees of temperature can it slash yet with a fan on. This submitted performance log was collected using the a previous firmware (than the latest).

@nschloe
Copy link
Owner

nschloe commented Dec 3, 2019

Thanks added those to the readme.

Added an issue for the firmware version. #52

the length of the test (5 minutes ?) is way too short.

It's good enough for the comparison between cases. I might extend it in the future though.

I also miss ambient temperature, because you can't make a fair comparison if you don't know it.

The raspberry doesn't have a sensor for the ambient temp which is why I didn't include it. You're right that this isn't very scientific.

I've also noticed different cooling performance with a monitor connected and then without a monitor. 4K monitor would make the device heat up even more.

Interesting!

@shortbloke
Copy link
Contributor

@CooliPi My fork of this project includes using capturing the Ambient temperature using a DHT11, DHT22 or AM2302 based sensor. I think this is necessary if the goal is to compare cases with the fewest variables impacting the comparisons. https://github.com/shortbloke/stressberry

In addition, the idle, and run stress run times are now configurable via the command line.

I accept this isn't all that useful when looking for results linked in the readme here, since they are intentionally all running exactly the same test, but in unknown conditions. I published my own results on my blog https://martinrowan.co.uk where I standardised on a 1 hour test.

There are many variables that will impact the temperature:

  • GUI vs Terminal
  • Background processes
  • Attached USB devices
  • WiFi or Ethernet
  • Firmware versions of specific components
  • Screen resolution
  • Enabling 4k display support
  • Overclocking
  • more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants