Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Node.js Foundation Website Redesign Strategic Initiative Meeting 2019-06-20 #173

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Time

UTC Thu 20-Jun-2019 16:00 (04:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Thu 20-Jun-2019 09:00 (09:00 AM)
US / Mountain Thu 20-Jun-2019 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Central Thu 20-Jun-2019 11:00 (11:00 AM)
US / Eastern Thu 20-Jun-2019 12:00 (12:00 PM)
London Thu 20-Jun-2019 17:00 (05:00 PM)
Amsterdam Thu 20-Jun-2019 18:00 (06:00 PM)
Moscow Thu 20-Jun-2019 19:00 (07:00 PM)
Chennai Thu 20-Jun-2019 21:30 (09:30 PM)
Hangzhou Fri 21-Jun-2019 00:00 (12:00 AM)
Tokyo Fri 21-Jun-2019 01:00 (01:00 AM)
Sydney Fri 21-Jun-2019 02:00 (02:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from wr-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/website-redesign

  • Create data contract for how API documentation will be consumed #158
  • New Home: Nodejs.dev? #147

nodejs/nodejs.dev

  • SPIKE: In Our Perfect World, In What Format Would the API Be Documented? #258
  • Integrate Algolia Code Search #257
  • Integrate API JSON as an async data source #255
  • Select and Integrate an i18n Library #254

Invited

  • Website Redesign Strategic Initiative Team: @nodejs/website-redesign

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with wr-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Jun 17, 2019
@LaRuaNa
Copy link
Contributor

LaRuaNa commented Jun 20, 2019

Sorry I won't make it today. :[

@amiller-gh
Copy link
Member

Booo! We'll miss you @LaRuaNa. @keywordnew, able to join today?

@BeniCheni
Copy link
Contributor

Was gonna join, and work meeting collided. Sorry about the miss in today’s session.

The tagged Agenda items look really exciting. Will watch YouTube to follow to catch up. Thanks and have a good day!

@jonchurch
Copy link

jonchurch commented Jun 20, 2019

My personal takeaways

Design System figma link

Project prototype: (at the top left you can navigate to the other pages of the project to view Layout, UI Elements, and Iconography so far)

@ogonzal87 is interested in feedback on the overall layout of the site and content, see the prototype linked above. The hierarchy of the information, should it change? Should things be moved around? Basically checkout the Information Architecture, any feedback on where things should go to better serve users. Google analytics suggests users come to the existing site for primarily Docs, and downloading the latest version of Node.js
Next steps are to gather feedback on the structure. Design comments are welcome, but not as urgent as feedback on placement and overall flow of elements on the prototype.

We are going to merge the two repos (WR into nodejs.dev), @amiller-gh has created a PR to merge the two. Merge will happen and issues moved over, pending any feedback, likely by June 24th 2019.

The skeleton of the site's pages isn't complete at this point. Maybe creating skeletons (placeholders essentially) for the various pages could help folks jump in and add features?

@amiller-gh will continue fleshing out the issues in the Project Boards, and work on more infrastructure related issues. Hopefully find some time for dev work on the issues as well.

@jonchurch
Copy link

jonchurch commented Jun 24, 2019

@amiller-gh Hey I noticed the link in the youtube video description from this meeting points to a meeting issue for the bootstrap team?

Is that link supposed to point here?

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 22, 2023

I've unarchived this repo so I can close all PRs and issues before re-archiving.

@Trott Trott closed this as completed Apr 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants