Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minutes notes from Vancouver Node+JS Interactive Security WG summit #417

Closed
lirantal opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@lirantal
Copy link
Member

lirantal commented Oct 13, 2018

Security WG Agenda minutes

General notes that came up

  • jasnell: For Node.js Core security program we want more people to join so that it will be easier to handle the load and work on that (due to some Node core members signing off from work there)

  • Node.js policies issue #22112 - if you have opinions or ideas please get involved on the PR; bengl: there’s also another security implementation by bradley mack that we should consider

  • Open an issue on the repo to find a good time for everyone to attend the monthly

  • Can we create more exposure and awareness of Node.js Security related topics, tools and practices using a dedicated page/repo

What does broad community believe security-wg should be working on?

  • jasnell: having a set of security related test suites
  • davisjam: adding as part of CI scanning for regexes
  • vladimir: creating best practices for the Node.js platform
  • trott: its worth checking with the docs team about the security best practices
  • davisjam: can we have a list of known security tools or guides in the ecosystem
  • jasnell: can we facilitate the vulnerability database in such a way that it is a single hub that vulnerabilities are being funneled to and the ecosystem, including commercial companies (i.e: snyk/npm/sqreen), can work on it together with the same shared guidelines, processes, etc.

Debugger issue

We have consensus on issuing a CVE for the node core debugger issue where the debugger defaults to listening on all ports. alejandro and jasnell: we should probably do better at communicating this such as a blog post. we can document the change in the node docs too.

P.S.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

I'm thinking we should PR this into the repo along with our regular minutes as opposed to having it as an issue?

@lirantal
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, I'll take it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants