Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs WG Call for Members #4573

Closed
chrisdickinson opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Docs WG Call for Members #4573

chrisdickinson opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Comments

@chrisdickinson
Copy link
Contributor

Hey all! 👋

As a heads up, there's talk going on in the node issue tracker about ratifying the Docs WG. As part of this, we've landed on a working proposal for where the docs will live. Per this proposal, the Docs WG will be working within the nodejs/node repo. This means that we can work to apply internationalization to the API docs as well. 🎉

If you've been working on the docs and would like to become part of the Docs WG, please note your interest on this issue and we'll get you on board. There will be a meeting in late January to discuss the state of the proposal. You may want to take a gander at the contributing and getting-started docs, as well! They're not set in stone but they reflect the current ethos of the WG.

I'll close this issue in two weeks.

Thanks, all!

@mscdex mscdex added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. labels Jan 7, 2016
@kosamari
Copy link

kosamari commented Jan 7, 2016


because this is hard : https://twitter.com/kosamari/status/656133780361510912
(also would love to involve in getting i18n of docs - at NodeFestTokyo issue was brought up that Japanese version - which live as community translation on user group website - is not up to date)

@a0viedo
Copy link
Member

a0viedo commented Jan 7, 2016

Hi @chrisdickinson, I'll be happy to help with what I can. I think, as @kosamari stated, some parts of the docs could really use improvements specially to abstract core concepts to a level that any user could understand, not only core contributors.

@chrisdickinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

As promised, I am now closing this issue — if you still want to help out with the Docs WG, fret not, you can sign up here. Thanks all! 👋

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants