deps: V8: cherry-pick 044b9b6f589d

Original commit message:

    [explicit-resource-management] disallow using in switch cases

    This CL disallows `using` and `await using` in switch cases.
    This was a normative change that got consensus in TC39 meetings:
    rbuckton/ecma262#14

    Bug: 409478039
    Change-Id: I077e75d7d0d632c8b34150cfc76e4903984d6091
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/6500234
    Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Rezvan Mahdavi Hezaveh <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#100037}

Refs: v8/v8@044b9b6
PR-URL: #58230
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>

Author: rmahdav

common.gypi

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
     # Reset this number to 0 on major V8 upgrades.
     # Increment by one for each non-official patch applied to deps/v8.
-    'v8_embedder_string': '-node.13',
+    'v8_embedder_string': '-node.14',
 
     ##### V8 defaults for Node.js #####
 

deps/v8/src/parsing/parser-base.h

@@ -1165,16 +1165,18 @@ class ParserBase {
   }
   bool is_using_allowed() const {
     // UsingDeclaration and AwaitUsingDeclaration are Syntax Errors if the goal
-    // symbol is Script. UsingDeclaration and AwaitUsingDeclaration are not
-    // contained, either directly or indirectly, within a Block, CaseBlock,
-    // ForStatement, ForInOfStatement, FunctionBody, GeneratorBody,
+    // symbol is Script. UsingDeclaration and AwaitUsingDeclaration are Syntax
+    // Errors if they are not contained, either directly or indirectly, within a
+    // Block, ForStatement, ForInOfStatement, FunctionBody, GeneratorBody,
     // AsyncGeneratorBody, AsyncFunctionBody, ClassStaticBlockBody, or
-    // ClassBody. Unless the current scope's ScopeType is ScriptScope, the
+    // ClassBody. They are disallowed in 'bare' switch cases.
+    // Unless the current scope's ScopeType is ScriptScope, the
     // current position is directly or indirectly within one of the productions
     // listed above since they open a new scope.
-    return ((scope()->scope_type() != SCRIPT_SCOPE &&
-             scope()->scope_type() != EVAL_SCOPE) ||
-            scope()->scope_type() == REPL_MODE_SCOPE);
+    return (((scope()->scope_type() != SCRIPT_SCOPE &&
+              scope()->scope_type() != EVAL_SCOPE) ||
+             scope()->scope_type() == REPL_MODE_SCOPE) &&
+            !scope()->is_nonlinear());
   }
   bool IsNextUsingKeyword(Token::Value token_after_using, bool is_await_using) {
     // using and await using declarations in for-of statements must be followed

deps/v8/test/test262/test262.status

@@ -1277,6 +1277,10 @@
   # May OOM fatally
   'staging/sm/regress/regress-610026': [SKIP],
 
+  # https://github.com/rbuckton/ecma262/pull/14
+  'staging/explicit-resource-management/await-using-in-switch-case-block': [SKIP],
+  'staging/explicit-resource-management/call-dispose-methods': [SKIP],
+
   ############################ SLOW TESTS #############################
 
   'annexB/built-ins/RegExp/RegExp-leading-escape-BMP': [PASS, SLOW],

deps/v8/test/unittests/parser/decls-unittest.cc

@@ -1082,6 +1082,24 @@ TEST_F(DeclsTest, TestUsing) {
                   EXPECT_ERROR);
     context.Check("{var using; \n using = 42;}", EXPECT_RESULT,
                   Number::New(isolate(), 42));
+    context.Check(
+        "let label = \"1\"; \n switch (label) { \n case 1: \n let y = 2; \n"
+        "using x = { \n "
+        "     value: 1, \n "
+        "      [Symbol.dispose]() { \n "
+        "       return 42; \n "
+        "     } \n "
+        "   };  }",
+        EXPECT_ERROR);
+    context.Check(
+        "let label = \"1\"; \n switch (label) { \n case 1: {\n let y = 2; \n"
+        "using x = { \n "
+        "     value: 1, \n "
+        "      [Symbol.dispose]() { \n "
+        "       return 42; \n "
+        "     } \n "
+        "   };  } }",
+        EXPECT_RESULT, Undefined(isolate()));
   }
 }
 
@@ -1144,6 +1162,17 @@ TEST_F(DeclsTest, TestAwaitUsing) {
         " } } \n "
         " f(); ",
         EXPECT_ERROR);
+    context.Check(
+        "async function f() {let label = \"1\"; \n switch (label){ \n case 1: "
+        "\n let y = 2;"
+        "\n await using x = { \n "
+        "     value: 1, \n "
+        "      [Symbol.asyncDispose]() { \n "
+        "       classStaticBlockBodyValues.push(42); \n "
+        "     } \n "
+        "   }; \n }"
+        "} \n f();",
+        EXPECT_ERROR);
   }
 }