diff --git a/lib/internal/timers.js b/lib/internal/timers.js
index b44952cafefe57..c8d8e5a6c330d8 100644
--- a/lib/internal/timers.js
+++ b/lib/internal/timers.js
@@ -1,5 +1,77 @@
 'use strict';
 
+// HOW and WHY the timers implementation works the way it does.
+//
+// Timers are crucial to Node.js. Internally, any TCP I/O connection creates a
+// timer so that we can time out of connections. Additionally, many user
+// libraries and applications also use timers. As such there may be a
+// significantly large amount of timeouts scheduled at any given time.
+// Therefore, it is very important that the timers implementation is performant
+// and efficient.
+//
+// Note: It is suggested you first read through the lib/internal/linkedlist.js
+// linked list implementation, since timers depend on it extensively. It can be
+// somewhat counter-intuitive at first, as it is not actually a class. Instead,
+// it is a set of helpers that operate on an existing object.
+//
+// In order to be as performant as possible, the architecture and data
+// structures are designed so that they are optimized to handle the following
+// use cases as efficiently as possible:
+
+// - Adding a new timer. (insert)
+// - Removing an existing timer. (remove)
+// - Handling a timer timing out. (timeout)
+//
+// Whenever possible, the implementation tries to make the complexity of these
+// operations as close to constant-time as possible.
+// (So that performance is not impacted by the number of scheduled timers.)
+//
+// Object maps are kept which contain linked lists keyed by their duration in
+// milliseconds.
+//
+/* eslint-disable node-core/non-ascii-character */
+//
+// ╔════ > Object Map
+// ║
+// ╠══
+// ║ lists: { '40': { }, '320': { etc } } (keys of millisecond duration)
+// ╚══          ┌────┘
+//              │
+// ╔══          │
+// ║ TimersList { _idleNext: { }, _idlePrev: (self) }
+// ║         ┌────────────────┘
+// ║    ╔══  │                              ^
+// ║    ║    { _idleNext: { },  _idlePrev: { }, _onTimeout: (callback) }
+// ║    ║      ┌───────────┘
+// ║    ║      │                                  ^
+// ║    ║      { _idleNext: { etc },  _idlePrev: { }, _onTimeout: (callback) }
+// ╠══  ╠══
+// ║    ║
+// ║    ╚════ >  Actual JavaScript timeouts
+// ║
+// ╚════ > Linked List
+//
+/* eslint-enable node-core/non-ascii-character */
+//
+// With this, virtually constant-time insertion (append), removal, and timeout
+// is possible in the JavaScript layer. Any one list of timers is able to be
+// sorted by just appending to it because all timers within share the same
+// duration. Therefore, any timer added later will always have been scheduled to
+// timeout later, thus only needing to be appended.
+// Removal from an object-property linked list is also virtually constant-time
+// as can be seen in the lib/internal/linkedlist.js implementation.
+// Timeouts only need to process any timers currently due to expire, which will
+// always be at the beginning of the list for reasons stated above. Any timers
+// after the first one encountered that does not yet need to timeout will also
+// always be due to timeout at a later time.
+//
+// Less-than constant time operations are thus contained in two places:
+// The PriorityQueue — an efficient binary heap implementation that does all
+// operations in worst-case O(log n) time — which manages the order of expiring
+// Timeout lists and the object map lookup of a specific list by the duration of
+// timers within (or creation of a new list). However, these operations combined
+// have shown to be trivial in comparison to other timers architectures.
+
 const {
   scheduleTimer,
   toggleTimerRef,
diff --git a/lib/timers.js b/lib/timers.js
index 14d0b92fe58ac9..1ed88f282384e9 100644
--- a/lib/timers.js
+++ b/lib/timers.js
@@ -63,78 +63,6 @@ const {
   emitDestroy
 } = require('internal/async_hooks');
 
-// HOW and WHY the timers implementation works the way it does.
-//
-// Timers are crucial to Node.js. Internally, any TCP I/O connection creates a
-// timer so that we can time out of connections. Additionally, many user
-// libraries and applications also use timers. As such there may be a
-// significantly large amount of timeouts scheduled at any given time.
-// Therefore, it is very important that the timers implementation is performant
-// and efficient.
-//
-// Note: It is suggested you first read through the lib/internal/linkedlist.js
-// linked list implementation, since timers depend on it extensively. It can be
-// somewhat counter-intuitive at first, as it is not actually a class. Instead,
-// it is a set of helpers that operate on an existing object.
-//
-// In order to be as performant as possible, the architecture and data
-// structures are designed so that they are optimized to handle the following
-// use cases as efficiently as possible:
-
-// - Adding a new timer. (insert)
-// - Removing an existing timer. (remove)
-// - Handling a timer timing out. (timeout)
-//
-// Whenever possible, the implementation tries to make the complexity of these
-// operations as close to constant-time as possible.
-// (So that performance is not impacted by the number of scheduled timers.)
-//
-// Object maps are kept which contain linked lists keyed by their duration in
-// milliseconds.
-//
-/* eslint-disable node-core/non-ascii-character */
-//
-// ╔════ > Object Map
-// ║
-// ╠══
-// ║ lists: { '40': { }, '320': { etc } } (keys of millisecond duration)
-// ╚══          ┌────┘
-//              │
-// ╔══          │
-// ║ TimersList { _idleNext: { }, _idlePrev: (self) }
-// ║         ┌────────────────┘
-// ║    ╔══  │                              ^
-// ║    ║    { _idleNext: { },  _idlePrev: { }, _onTimeout: (callback) }
-// ║    ║      ┌───────────┘
-// ║    ║      │                                  ^
-// ║    ║      { _idleNext: { etc },  _idlePrev: { }, _onTimeout: (callback) }
-// ╠══  ╠══
-// ║    ║
-// ║    ╚════ >  Actual JavaScript timeouts
-// ║
-// ╚════ > Linked List
-//
-/* eslint-enable node-core/non-ascii-character */
-//
-// With this, virtually constant-time insertion (append), removal, and timeout
-// is possible in the JavaScript layer. Any one list of timers is able to be
-// sorted by just appending to it because all timers within share the same
-// duration. Therefore, any timer added later will always have been scheduled to
-// timeout later, thus only needing to be appended.
-// Removal from an object-property linked list is also virtually constant-time
-// as can be seen in the lib/internal/linkedlist.js implementation.
-// Timeouts only need to process any timers currently due to expire, which will
-// always be at the beginning of the list for reasons stated above. Any timers
-// after the first one encountered that does not yet need to timeout will also
-// always be due to timeout at a later time.
-//
-// Less-than constant time operations are thus contained in two places:
-// The PriorityQueue — an efficient binary heap implementation that does all
-// operations in worst-case O(log n) time — which manages the order of expiring
-// Timeout lists and the object map lookup of a specific list by the duration of
-// timers within (or creation of a new list). However, these operations combined
-// have shown to be trivial in comparison to other timers architectures.
-
 // Remove a timer. Cancels the timeout and resets the relevant timer properties.
 function unenroll(item) {
   // Fewer checks may be possible, but these cover everything.