Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

Possible new IRC channel for iojs.org? #61

Closed
therebelrobot opened this issue Jan 14, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Possible new IRC channel for iojs.org? #61

therebelrobot opened this issue Jan 14, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

Might be a good idea, just to keep the core channel free for core stuff.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Done. I think #iojs.org makes the most sense for a name.

(That being said, I think using #io.js is fine.. for now? It keeps everything together and everyone in the loop imo.)

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just thought it might be good to have a specific chan for it. Now that io.js is released, that chan is going to have more and more core related chats, having one for website specific, even if only used by the website work group, might be a good idea.

Agreed on the name though :)

@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe we should stay open to the idea but wait for the primary channel to louder first? I actually like the transparency of discussing this stuff on the main chan. Side benefits: keeps people more actively aware that there is even a website project to begin with. More crowd sourced opinions.

@indexzero
Copy link
Contributor

I am now idling in there on irccloud if there are any questions 😄

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Jan 14, 2015

I'm -1 on splitting up communication right now. The website work is still very closely tied to the releases which are organized in the main channel.

@indexzero
Copy link
Contributor

Noted.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I'm with @mikeal. I just registered the channel for now.

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor Author

kk. that works. :)

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as we're sticking to #io.js

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants