-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bot comment on build failure #251
Comments
To ensure I understand you correctly and having in mind I haven't used |
Exactly. It would look like this: nodejs/node#32116 (comment) Edit: I updated all Bot comments on nodejs/node#32116 to also include the failures, if anyone wants to see how "the bot could edit it's own comment" would look like. |
I just thought of two other huge benefits of this:
|
Well said! I definitively see the value of trying what you're proposing. Learning from well intentioned changes we've introduced before, that ended up getting reverted later primarily because we didn't reach out to core collaborators beforehand, I'm wondering if we could do some kind of collaborator vote or similar before jumping onto implementing this? |
That might be a good idea. I also think the "edit comment" idea would be more likely to be well received. I'll start a poll, thank you for the suggestion. |
(not when the job fails to start, but when the tests or build fails, so it wouldn't revert #238)
node-core-utils
has this great toolncu-ci pr
, which can be used to get a list of failing tests. We could use the GitHub Bot to comment the result ofncu-ci pr
back on the Pull Request when a build fails, so it's easier for folks to see which errors happened. Or the bot could edit it's own comment, to avoid notifications, but personally I would like to get notified (I understand folks might be opposed to it though).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: