Skip to content

Apple required agreement is missing or has expired #3605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
UlisesGascon opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Apple required agreement is missing or has expired #3605

UlisesGascon opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

The Apple notarization can't be done for new releases:

08:05:52 Error: HTTP status code: 403. A required agreement is missing or has expired. This request requires an in-effect agreement that has not been signed or has expired. Ensure your team has signed the necessary legal agreements and that they are not expired.

Full log

Checking the build emails, seems that this is the new agreement changes based on this email Updated Apple Developer Program License Agreement Now Available. from 22 Dec 2023:

The Apple Developer Program License Agreement has been revised to support updated policies and provide clarification. The revisions include:

  • Definitions, Section 3.3.3(N): Updated "Tap to Present ID" to "ID Verifier"
  • Definitions, Section 14.10: Updated terms regarding governing law and venue
  • Section 3.3: Reorganized and categorized provisions for clarity
  • Section 3.3.3(B): Clarified language on privacy and third-party SDKs
  • Section 6.7: Updated terms regarding analytics
  • Section 12: Clarified warranty disclaimer language
  • Attachment 1: Updated terms for use of Apple Push Notification Service and Local Notifications
  • Attachment 9: Updated terms for Xcode Cloud compute hours included with Apple Developer Program membership
    Please sign in to your account to review and accept the full terms and conditions.

Pending actions

I will login and accept the changes following the example from #3478

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member Author

I signed the agreement, I will close this issue as soon as iojs+release -> 9889 is passing

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member Author

The CI worked fine, so I will close the issue now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants