Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 17, 2019. It is now read-only.

Q&A w/ @tejasmanohar on Individual Membership Candidacy #25

Closed
mikeal opened this issue Jan 18, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Q&A w/ @tejasmanohar on Individual Membership Candidacy #25

mikeal opened this issue Jan 18, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Jan 18, 2016

This thread is for asking @tejasmanohar questions regarding his run
for the Node.js Foundation Board of Directors.

@mikeal mikeal added the q-and-a label Jan 18, 2016
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Jan 18, 2016

(A) If elected, what do you envision would be three most important issues that need to be addressed and how would you go about advocating for / resolving those?

(B) In a single sentence, how would you describe the role of the person elected to the board?

@rosskukulinski
Copy link

Hi @tejasmanohar. Thanks for applying to be an Individual Member of the board. Should you be elected, how do you plan to listen and engage with the large (and growing) NodeJS community and then channel that back to the Board?

@junosuarez
Copy link

  1. What do you see as the most significant obstacle to node.js's continued growth?
  2. What do you think the node.js foundation can do to address your answer to Initial Meeting #1?

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jan 27, 2016

ping @tejasmanohar

@tejasmanohar
Copy link

Hey all!

I'd say that the most significant obstacles to the platform's growth at the moment are

  • average skill level amongst Node.js developers / solving the "gap"
  • limiting release cycle

Thus, I believe the most important issues to address are as follows:

  • Upgrading documentation so that it's readable to those with no prior programming experience and pointing them in the right direction to nail down fundamental JS before starting (in short, community <> resource building).
  • Making sure the release cycle doesn't limit individuals. I whole-heartedly agree w/ @domenic's reasoning here.
  • Keeping things BS-free by making sure everything is done with good intents while laying utmost emphasis on technical issues.

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor Author

mikeal commented Jan 31, 2016

Election is over, results are posted.

@mikeal mikeal closed this as completed Jan 31, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants