You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I added a print in the rate_buffer function to check what blocks were being visited:
def rate_buffer(buffer):
visited_blocks = [get_state_block(state) for state in buffer.states]
print(set(visited_blocks))
n_unique = len(set(visited_blocks))
return n_unique
and, from the very beginning, I get a print of: {0, None} and a coverage value equal to 2.
Is this an intended behaviour?
EDIT: a few additional details.
The (x_block, y_block) for the 'None' values are ('mid','left').
Also, when the coverage raises to 3, the visited blocks are {0,None,6}, which are 'low,left', 'mid,left', 'high,left'. Thus, I suppose there is an error in the way the blocks are assigned to numbers in the get_state_block function.
If you agree on this, I can make a PR to fix it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I added a print in the rate_buffer function to check what blocks were being visited:
and, from the very beginning, I get a print of:
{0, None}
and acoverage
value equal to 2.Is this an intended behaviour?
EDIT: a few additional details.
The (x_block, y_block) for the 'None' values are ('mid','left').
Also, when the coverage raises to 3, the visited blocks are {0,None,6}, which are 'low,left', 'mid,left', 'high,left'. Thus, I suppose there is an error in the way the blocks are assigned to numbers in the
get_state_block
function.If you agree on this, I can make a PR to fix it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: