Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrading the libraries to .net standard 1.6 and full .net 4.6.2 #3

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 7, 2017

Conversation

Arash-Sabet
Copy link
Collaborator

I upgraded SharpSimpleNLG to .net standard 1.6 and created a .net core console application to test it out. The console application's code is similar to the original console application shipped in the solution. I was never able to run tests from the time when I forked the solution and since the compilation passes I assume that the tests should pass too. Please verify the changes, merge with the original master and feel free to deploy new nuget packages.

Upgraded the solution to Visual Studio 2017 and all .net 4.5.2 projects switched to version 4.6.2.
@nickhodge nickhodge merged commit bf39440 into nickhodge:master Jul 7, 2017
@nickhodge
Copy link
Owner

I've merged these changes in, and published 1.2.0 onto NuGet. I hope I've done this the correct way. :-)

@nickhodge
Copy link
Owner

@Arash-Sabet AND THANKS for the PR. I hope you are finding this port of the Univ of Aberdeen SimpleNLG useful.

@Arash-Sabet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nickhodge You are more than welcome! It’s a great and useful library and let’s keep it up-to-date as much as possible. Would you mind reflecting the newer version info in the Version News section of the markdown? Thanks.

@Arash-Sabet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nickhodge I just checked out this library's nuget package; I have to say that the dependencies section needs to be updated to reflect the right versions of .net.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants