You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[ ] Regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped working in a new release)
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Performance issue
[X] Feature request
[ ] Documentation issue or request
[ ] Support request
[ ] Other... Please describe:
Current behavior
When guard is put on a route and a component without isDirty$ implementation the guard triggers the confirmChanges method. I'm not sure if this is a desired behavior.
Minimal reproduction of the problem with instructions
Put the Guard on a route with a component that doesn't implement the isDirty$ property.
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
It would make sense to not have the confirmChanges triggers.
I can put a proposal if needed.
Best regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current behavior
When guard is put on a route and a component without isDirty$ implementation the guard triggers the confirmChanges method. I'm not sure if this is a desired behavior.
Minimal reproduction of the problem with instructions
Put the Guard on a route with a component that doesn't implement the isDirty$ property.
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
It would make sense to not have the confirmChanges triggers.
I can put a proposal if needed.
Best regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: