Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

couldn't get LLFF scene grade #55

Open
that-liu opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

couldn't get LLFF scene grade #55

that-liu opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@that-liu
Copy link

I used python train.py -scene ${PATH_TO_SCENE} -model_dir ${MODEL_TO_SAVE_CHECKPOINT} -http-cv2resize in the flower scene of llff, But did not get the grade of the paper, using four rtx2080Ti,
Measurement Result
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
name PSNR SSIM LPIPS
images_IMG_2962.JPG 25.110090 0.873111 0.24526712
images_IMG_2970.JPG 26.380335 0.898152 0.20776317
images_IMG_2978.JPG 25.021733 0.861492 0.22302648
images_IMG_2986.JPG 28.067660 0.920080 0.17454995
images_IMG_2994.JPG 28.821845 0.926312 0.17679015

PSNR 26.680332
SSIM 0.895829
LPIPS 0.205479

@pureexe
Copy link
Contributor

pureexe commented Jan 16, 2024

Last month, someone emailed me about this problem. I investigated this and confirmed that our code has a different score than the score reported in the paper.

In case you want to use NeX as a baseline comparison. In that case, you can report the score from either retraining, measuring directly from the provided result in the dataset directory, or taking directly from the paper, which is fine for me.

Here is the table showing how the score is drifting on Crest and Trex

Crest

Crest PSNR SSIM LPIPS
Paper report 21.23 0.757 0.162
Retrained 20.72 0.714 0.177

Trex

Trex PSNR SSIM LPIPS
Paper report 28.73 0.953 0.192
Retrained 28.69 0.952 0.192

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants