-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathdraft-ietf-nmop-yang-message-broker-integration-03.txt
1288 lines (878 loc) · 48.4 KB
/
draft-ietf-nmop-yang-message-broker-integration-03.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
NMOP T. Graf
Internet-Draft A. Elhassany
Intended status: Informational Swisscom
Expires: 4 January 2025 3 July 2024
An Architecture for YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration
draft-ietf-nmop-yang-message-broker-integration-03
Abstract
This document describes the motivation and architecture of a native
YANG-Push notifications and YANG Schema integration into a Message
Broker and YANG Schema Registry.
Discussion Venues
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Operations and
Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list
([email protected]), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmop/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/network-analytics/draft-daisy-kafka-yang-
integration/.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 January 2025.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Origins of YANG-Push . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Origins of Apache Kafka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1. Automatic Onboarding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2. Preserve Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3. Preserve Semantic Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4. Standardize Data Processing Integration . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Elements of the Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. YANG-Push Subscription . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.2. YANG-Push Publisher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3. YANG-Push Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.4. YANG Schema Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.5. YANG Message Broker Producer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.6. YANG Message_Broker Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.7. YANG Time Series Database Ingestion . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.8. YANG Time Series Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.1. YANG Schema Registry Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2. YANG-Push Receiver Parsing Library . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.3. YANG Library Augmented-by Addition . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Appendix A. Project Milestones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Appendix B. Open Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
1. Introduction
Nowadays network operators are using YANG [RFC7950] to model their
configurations and obtain YANG modelled data from their networks. It
is well understood that plain text are initially intended for humans
and need effort to make it machine readable due to the lack of
semantics. YANG modeled data is addressing most of these needs.
Increasingly more network operators organizing their data in a Data
Mesh [Deh22] where a Message Broker such as Apache Kafka [Kaf11] or
RabbitMQ [Rab07] facilitates the exchange of messages among data
processing components like a stream processor to filter, enrich,
correlate or aggregate, or a time series database to store data.
Even though YANG is intend to ease the handling of data, this promise
has not yet been fulfilled for Network Telemetry [RFC9232]. From
subscribing on a YANG datastore, publishing a YANG modeled
notifications message from the network and viewing the data in a time
series database, manual labor, such as obtaining the YANG schema from
the network and creating a transformation or ingestion specification
into a time series database, is needed to make a Message Broker and
its data processing components with YANG notifications interoparable.
Since YANG modules can change over time, for example when a router is
being upgraded to a newer software release, this process needs to be
adjusted contionously, leading often to errors in the data chain if
dependencies are not properly tracked and schema changes adjusted
simultaneously.
1.1. Origins of YANG-Push
With [RFC3535] the IAB set the requirements for Network Management in
2003. From these requirements NETCONF [RFC6241], NETCONF
Notifications [RFC5277] and RESTCONF [RFC8040] have been defined to
configure through <edit-config> and retrieve operational data through
<get> and NETCONF notifications through <notification> from a YANG
datastore on a network node.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
With YANG-Push, as defined in [RFC8639], [RFC8640] and [RFC8641],
periodical and on-change subscriptions to the YANG datastore can be
dynamically or statically configured. When notifications are
dynamically configured, messages are published over the initially
established NETCONF session, while when it is statically configured
messages are published through HTTPS-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-https-notif] or UDP-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-udp-notif] transport. Section 3.7 of [RFC8641]
describes push-update messages where the YANG subscribed data is
being published, where Section 2.7 of [RFC8639] describes the
subscription state change notifications where changes in the
subscription are being described.
1.2. Origins of Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka [Kaf11] is a Message Broker that supports producing and
consuming messages from so called topics. Each topic has one or more
partitions where messages are replicated or load balanced to scale
out. With the introduction of Confluent Schema Registry [Con18] a
topic can contain one or more subjects. A subject refers to a Schema
defining the structure of the message. The Schema then is used to
validate messages sent through topics and are identified by a Schema
ID. The Schema ID is issued when the Schema is registered to the
Confluent Schema Registry. Once the Schema ID is obtained, it can be
prefixed to the message with a Confluent Schema Registry compatible
serializer. Messages can then be validated against Schema at the
producer or at the consumer from a topic to ensure Schema integrity
of the message. The type of Schema evolution scheme can be defined
per subject, wherever non backward compatibility changes are allowed
or not.
1.3. Document Scope
This document focuses on YANG-Push [RFC8641] as the messaging
protocol between the network node and the Network Telemetry [RFC9232]
data collection. It describes the main components and the aimed
architecture for deploying such solution in a production network.
Then, it illustrates the integration of the YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] as a
schema modeling language into the Apache Kafka Message Broker and
Confluent Schema Registry [Con18].
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
2.1. Terminology
This document defines the following terms:
Message Broker: is an intermediary software component that translates
messages from the formal messaging protocol of the sender to the
formal messaging protocol of the receiver routed in topics. Message
brokers are elements in Data Mesh where software applications
communicate by exchanging formally-defined messages.
Stream Catalog: provides a single point of access that allows users
to centrally search semantics for information across a Message
Broker.
Additionally it makes use of the terms defined in [RFC8639], Apache
Kafka [Kaf11] and Confluent Schema Registry Documentation [ConDoc18].
The following terms are used as defined in [RFC8639]:
* Publisher
* Receiver
* Subscription
* Subscription ID
* Event stream filter
* Notification message
The following terms are used as defined in Apache Kafka Message
Broker [Kaf11]:
* Producer
* Consumer
* Topic
* Partition
The following terms are used as defined in Confluent Schema Registry
Documentation [ConDoc18]:
* Schema
* Schema ID
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
* Schema Registry
* Subject
3. Motivation
There are four main objectives for native YANG-Push notifications and
YANG Schema integration into a Message Broker.
3.1. Automatic Onboarding
Automate the Data Mesh onboarding of newly subscribed YANG metrics.
3.2. Preserve Schema
The preservation of the YANG schema, that includes the YANG data
types as defined in [RFC6991] and the nested structure of the YANG
module, throughout the data processing chain ensures that metrics can
be processed and visualized as they were originally intended. Not
only for users but also for automated closed loop operation actions.
3.3. Preserve Semantic Information
[RFC7950] defines in Section 7.21.3 and 7.21.4 the description and
reference statement. This information is intended for the user,
describing in a human-readable fashion the meaning of a definition.
In Data Mesh, this information can be imported from the YANG Schema
Registry into a Stream Catalog where subjects within Message Broker
are identifiable and searchable. An example of a Stream Catalog is
Apache Atlas [Atl15]. It can also be applied for time series data
visualization in a similar fashion.
3.4. Standardize Data Processing Integration
Since the YANG Schema is preserved for operational metrics in the
Message Broker, a standardization for integration between network
data collection and stream processor or time series database is
implied.
4. Elements of the Architecture
The architecture consists of 6 elements. Figure 1 gives an overview
on the workflow.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Time Series Database |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
^
| (12) Ingest Data
| According to Schema
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Time Series Database Ingestion |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
(10) Get | ^ ^ (9) Validate
Schema | | | Serialized Message
| | | Schema on Consumer
| | |
| | +--------------------+
| | | Message |
| | | Broker |
| | +--------------------+
| | |
| | (11) Issue | (8) Serialize
| | | YANG-Push Message
| | | annotated Schema
v | Schema (6) Post | ID on Producer
+--------------------+ Schema +--------------------+
| YANG | <-------------- | Data Collection |
| Schema Registry | --------------> | YANG-Push Receiver |
+--------------------+ (7) Issue +--------------------+
Schema ID (4) Get | ^ (3) Receive
Schema | | YANG-Push
| | Subscription
| | Start Message
| | ^
| | |
| | | (5) Publish
| | | YANG-Push
| | | Message
| | | with
(1) Discover Notif. v | | Subscr. ID
+--------------------+ Capabilities +--------------------+
| Manage YANG-Push | ---------------> | Network Node |
| Subscription | (2) Subscribe | YANG-Push Publisher|
+--------------------+ ---------------> +--------------------+
Figure 1: End to End Workflow
The workflow diagram (Figure 1) describes the steps from establishing
the YANG-Push subscription to Time Series Database ingestion.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
4.1. YANG-Push Subscription
With step number (1) in the workflow diagram, the YANG-Push
notification capabilities are being discovered according to Section 3
of [RFC9196], in with step (2) a YANG-Push subscription is according
to Section 2.4 and 2.5 of [RFC8639] dynamically or statically
configured, and with step (3) subscription state change notifications
are sent according to section 2.7 from the YANG-Push publisher to the
receiver to inform which event stream filter has been applied to
which subscription ID.
When the YANG-Push subscription is managed dynamically, the YANG data
is being received on the same NETCONF session where the subscription
is being maintained. With configured subscription the YANG data is
sent to the YANG-Push receiver through a separate transport session.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning] adds the capability
to subscribe to a specific YANG module revision or a YANG module
which needs to be backward compatible to in step (2) and adds the
module name, revision and revision-label information into the
subscription state change notifications in step (3).
Figure 2 provides and example how to create a YANG-Push configured
subscription with NETCONF in XML [W3C.REC-xml-20081126] with UDP-
based [I-D.ietf-netconf-udp-notif] transport
========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792) ===========
<rpc message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<edit-config>
<target>
<running/>
</target>
<config>
<subscriptions xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf\
-subscribed-notifications">
<subscription>
<id>6666</id>
<datastore xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf\
-yang-push"
xmlns:ds="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf\
-datastores">ds:operational</datastore>
<datastore-xpath-filter xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns\
:yang:ietf-yang-push"
xmlns:if="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-inter\
faces">/if:interfaces</datastore-xpath-filter>
<revision xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang\
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
-push-revision">2018-02-20</revision>
<transport xmlns:unt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf\
-udp-notif-transport">unt:udp-notif</transport>
<encoding>encode-json</encoding>
<receivers>
<receiver>
<name>subscription-specific-receiver-def</name>
<receiver-instance-ref xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml\
:ns:yang:ietf-subscribed-notif-receivers">\
global-udp-notif-receiver-def</receiver-instance-ref>
</receiver>
</receivers>
<periodic xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-push">
<period>6000</period>
</periodic>
</subscription>
<receiver-instances xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf\
-subscribed-notif-receivers">
<receiver-instance>
<name>global-udp-notif-receiver-def</name>
<udp-notif-receiver xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang\
:ietf-udp-notif-transport">
<address>192.0.5.1</address>
<port>12345</port>
<enable-segmentation>false</enable-segmentation>
<max-segment-size/>
</udp-notif-receiver>
</receiver-instance>
</receiver-instances>
</subscriptions>
</config>
</edit-config>
</rpc>
Figure 2: NETCONF Example to establish configured subscription
Figure 3 provides an example of a JSON encoded, [RFC7951],
subscription-started state change notification message over HTTPS-
based [I-D.ietf-netconf-https-notif] or UDP-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-udp-notif] transport with
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-notif-sequencing],
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time] and
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning] as extensions for
the same subscription.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
{
"ietf-notification:notification": {
"eventTime": "2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sysName": "example-router",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sequenceNumber": 1,
"ietf-subscribed-notification:subscription-started": {
"id": 6666,
"ietf-yang-push:datastore": "ietf-datastores:operational",
"ietf-yang-push:datastore-xpath-filter": "/if:interfaces",
"ietf-yang-push-revision:revision": "2014-05-08",
"ietf-yang-push-revision:module-name": "ietf-interfaces",
"ietf-yang-push-revision:revision-label": "",
"ietf-distributed-notif:message-observation-domain-id": [1,2],
"transport": "ietf-udp-notif-transport:udp-notif",
"encoding": "encode-json",
"ietf-yang-push:periodic": {
"ietf-yang-push:period": 100
}
}
}
}
Figure 3: JSON YANG-Push Example for a subscription-started
notification message
4.2. YANG-Push Publisher
With step number (4) in the workflow diagram, a YANG-Push push-update
or push-change-update message, depending on wherever periodical or
on-change subscription has been established, is sent from the YANG-
Push publisher to the receiver according to Section 3.7 of [RFC8639].
[I-D.ahuang-netconf-notif-yang] defines the NETCONF notification
header specified in [RFC5277] in YANG to enable JSON and CBOR
encoding.
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-notif-sequencing] adds sysName, messagePublisherId
and sequenceNumber in the NETCONF notification header to each message
to identify from which network node and publishing process, according
to [I-D.ietf-netconf-distributed-notif] a network node with
distributed architecture could have multiple messagePublisherId's,
the message has been published from. The sequenceNumber enables to
recognize loss from the YANG-Push publisher in step (2) down to the
Time Series Database Ingestion in step (12).
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time] adds observation
timestamp and point-in-time in the YANG-Push push-update or push-
change-update message. observation timestamp contains the timestamp
and point-in-time when the metrics where observed. See Section 3 of
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time] for more details.
Figure 4 provides an example of a JSON encoded, [RFC7951], push-
update notification message over HTTPS-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-https-notif] or UDP-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-udp-notif] transport with
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-notif-sequencing] and
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time] as extensions for the
same subscription.
========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792) ===========
{
"ietf-notification:notification": {
"eventTime": "2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sysName": "example-router",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sequenceNumber": 1,
"ietf-yang-push:push-update": {
"id": 6666,
"ietf-yp-observation:timestamp": \
"2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
"ietf-yp-observation:point-in-time": \
"current-accounting",
"datastore-contents": {
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [
{
"interface": {
"name": "eth0",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"oper-status": "up",
"mtu": 1500
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
Figure 4: JSON YANG-Push Example for a push-update notification
message
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
Figure 5 provides an example of a JSON encoded, [RFC7951], push-
change-update notification message over HTTPS-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-https-notif] or UDP-based
[I-D.ietf-netconf-udp-notif] transport with
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-notif-sequencing] and
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time] as extensions for the
same subscription.
========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792) ===========
{
"ietf-notification:notification": {
"eventTime": "2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sysName": "example-router",
"ietf-notification-sequencing:sequenceNumber": 1,
"ietf-yang-push:push-change-update": {
"id": 2222,
"ietf-yp-observation:timestamp": \
"2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z",
"ietf-yp-observation:point-in-time": \
"state-changed",
"datastore-contents": {
"yang-patch": {
"patch-id": "patch_54",
"comment": "Changing encoding to JSON and increasing \
the period to 10 minutes",
"edit": [
{
"edit-id": "id_change_1",
"operation": "merge",
"target": "/ietf-subscribed-notifications\:subs\
criptions/subscription[id=2222]",
"value": {
"ietf-subscribed-notifications:encoding": \
"ietf-subscribed-notifications:encode-json",
"ietf-yang-push:periodic": {
"period": 60000
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
Figure 5: JSON YANG-Push Example for a push-change-update
notification message
4.3. YANG-Push Receiver
For all the YANG modules and revisions of each subscription ID in the
subscription state change notification received in step number (3) in
the workflow diagram, all the YANG module dependencies need to be
determined through the YANG Library [RFC8525], and then through
NETCONF <get-schema> rpc calls according to [RFC6022] all YANG
modules need to be retrieved as described in step (4) in the workflow
diagram.
[I-D.lincla-netconf-yang-library-augmentation] extends the YANG
Library so that not only the submodule but also the augmentation list
can be obtained.
Figure 9 in Section 4.1 and YANG module in Section 5 of [RFC8641]
defines the payload of YANG-push notifications where "datastore-
contents" or the "value" of a "push-change-update") is "anydata".
[RFC7950] Section 7.10 states that anydata represents an unknown set
of nodes that can be modeled with YANG, and the model is not known at
design time and that the model of the unknown set of nodes can be
signaled through another protocol. This poses and issue in the
schema validation of YANG-Push notifications and will be further
clarified in point number (1) and (2) in Appendix B.
4.4. YANG Schema Registry
The schema registry SHOULD support YANG as the format for defining
schema. For each schema registered into the schema registry, a
schema ID is returned. That schema ID can be used when interacting
with the Message Broker to indicate the schema to use with the
message.”
Confluent Schema Registry is pluggable. Currently Supports AVRO,
JSON Schema and Protobuf. The YANG support is being developed at
[Yak24] as part of this architecture. Enable to register, obtain and
compare [YSR24] YANG Schemas. One YANG Schema with all its
augmentations is being registered per YANG-Push subscription ID. for
each YANG Schema a locally significant Schema ID is being issued as
described in step (7) in the workflow diagram.
curl -X POST -H "Content Type: application/vnd.schemaregistry.v1+json"
http://localhost:8081/subjects/ietf-interfaces/
Figure 6: Register ietf-interfaces.yang into YANG Schema Registry
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
curl http://localhost:8081/subjects/ subjects/ | jq
Figure 7: List all subjects YANG Schema Registry
curl http://localhost:8081/subjects/ietf-interfaces/versions
Figure 8: List versions of a given subject in YANG Schema Registry
curl http://localhost:8081/subjects/ietf-interfaces/versions/1
Figure 9: Retrieve schema of a specific subject and version in
YANG Schema Registry
4.5. YANG Message Broker Producer
The previously issued Schema ID is prefixed to the previously in
Section 4.3 described metadata augmented YANG push push-update
message and serialized to a Message Broker topic in step (8) of the
workflow diagram.
4.6. YANG Message_Broker Consumer
From the Message Broker topic the message is being consumed and the
prefixed Schema ID is being used in step (10) of the workflow diagram
to retrieve the YANG Schema to validate the Schema integrity of the
message.
4.7. YANG Time Series Database Ingestion
The time series database ingestion specifications are being derived
with the in Section 4.6 already retrieved Schema ID and YANG-Push
push-update messages can be now ingested and indexed into the
database table according to their schema in step (12).
4.8. YANG Time Series Database
The YANG data is being ingested in step (12)according to the
previously defined ingestion specification and indexed with the
timestamp defined in observation timestamp as defined in
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time]. A network operator
is now able to query the previously subscribed YANG data.
5. Implementation Status
Note to the RFC-Editor: Please remove this section before publishing.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
The description of implementations in this section is intended to
assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort
has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not
be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
exist.
According to [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and working groups
to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature.
It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
they see fit".
5.1. YANG Schema Registry Extension
Ahmed Elhassany is developing a YANG Schema Extension in Confluent
Schema Registry.
The source code can be obtained here: [YSR24], the progress report
here: [YSRPR24], and was validated at the IETF 117 hackathon.
5.2. YANG-Push Receiver Parsing Library
Zhuoyao Lin developed as part of her internship a library to parse
YANG-Push subscription notifications, identify YANG module
dependencises with YANG Library [RFC8525] and obtain with NETCONF
<get-schema> rpc calls [RFC6022] all YANG modules from YANG-Push
publisher.
The source code can be obtained here: [LYP23] and was validated at
the IETF 117 hackathon.
5.3. YANG Library Augmented-by Addition
Zhuoyao Lin implemented
[I-D.lincla-netconf-yang-library-augmentation] in order to discover
augmented-by YANG modules in YANG Library [RFC8525].
The source code can be obtained here: [YLA24] and was validated at
the IETF 119 hackathon.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
6. Security Considerations
TBD
7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Yannick Buchs, Benoit Claise, Mohamed
Boucadair, Dhruv Dhody, Qin Wu, Andy Bierman, Feng Chong and Holger
Keller for their review and valuable comments. Alex Huang Feng, Jean
Quilbeuf and Zhuoyao Lin for review and contributing code and
providing examples and inputs to the open points.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[I-D.aelhassany-anydata-validation]
Elhassany, A., "Validating anydata in YANG Library
context", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
aelhassany-anydata-validation-01, 17 March 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-aelhassany-
anydata-validation-01>.
[I-D.ahuang-netconf-notif-yang]
Feng, A. H., Francois, P., Graf, T., and B. Claise, "YANG
model for NETCONF Event Notifications", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-05, 18
June 2024, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
ahuang-netconf-notif-yang-05>.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning]
Graf, T., Claise, B., and A. H. Feng, "Support of
Versioning in YANG Notifications Subscription", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-yang-
notifications-versioning-05, 16 June 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-
yang-notifications-versioning-05>.
[I-D.lincla-netconf-yang-library-augmentation]
Lin, Z., Claise, B., and I. D. Martinez-Casanueva,
"Augmented-by Addition into the IETF-YANG-Library", Work
in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-lincla-netconf-yang-
library-augmentation-01, 4 March 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lincla-
netconf-yang-library-augmentation-01>.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-notif-sequencing]
Graf, T., Quilbeuf, J., and A. H. Feng, "Support of
Hostname and Sequencing in YANG Notifications", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-tgraf-netconf-notif-
sequencing-06, 29 June 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tgraf-
netconf-notif-sequencing-06>.
[I-D.tgraf-netconf-yang-push-observation-time]
Graf, T., Claise, B., and A. H. Feng, "Support of Network
Observation Timestamping in YANG Notifications", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-push-
observation-time-01, 14 April 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tgraf-
netconf-yang-push-observation-time-01>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC6022] Scott, M. and M. Bjorklund, "YANG Module for NETCONF
Monitoring", RFC 6022, DOI 10.17487/RFC6022, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6022>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
[RFC8792] Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. Wu,
"Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and
RFCs", RFC 8792, DOI 10.17487/RFC8792, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8792>.
Graf & Elhassany Expires 4 January 2025 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG-Push to Message Broker Integration July 2024
[RFC9196] Lengyel, B., Clemm, A., and B. Claise, "YANG Modules
Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update
Notifications", RFC 9196, DOI 10.17487/RFC9196, February
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9196>.
[RFC9254] Veillette, M., Ed., Petrov, I., Ed., Pelov, A., Bormann,
C., and M. Richardson, "Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG
in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)",
RFC 9254, DOI 10.17487/RFC9254, July 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9254>.
8.2. Informative References
[Atl15] Hortonworks, "Apache Atlas", Apache Software Foundation,
May 2015, <https://atlas.apache.org/>.
[Con18] Yokota, R., "Confluent Schema Registry", Confluent
Community and Apache Software Foundation, December 2018,
<https://github.com/confluentinc/schema-registry/>.
[ConDoc18] Yokota, R., "Confluent Schema Registry Documentation",
Confluent Community and Apache Software Foundation,
December 2018,
<https://docs.confluent.io/platform/current/schema-
registry/>.
[Deh22] Dehghani, Z., "Data Mesh", O'Reilly Media,
ISBN 9781492092391, March 2022,
<https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/data-
mesh/9781492092384/>.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-distributed-notif]
Zhou, T., Zheng, G., Voit, E., Graf, T., and P. Francois,
"Subscription to Distributed Notifications", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-
notif-09, 28 April 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-
distributed-notif-09>.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-https-notif]
Jethanandani, M. and K. Watsen, "An HTTPS-based Transport
for YANG Notifications", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15, 1 February 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-