Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(adapter-node-http): Upgrade nock to v11.x #273

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2019

Conversation

offirgolan
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Motivation and Context

Resolves #263, #264

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My commits and the title of this PR follow the Conventional Commits Specification.
  • I have read the contributing guidelines.

const contentType = (headers['content-type'] || '').toString();
const isMultiPart = contentType.includes('multipart');

if (body) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah there is some overlap. @swashcap can validate and we can add some more test cases in that PR.

@offirgolan offirgolan marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2019 17:34
@offirgolan offirgolan requested a review from jasonmit November 19, 2019 17:34
@offirgolan offirgolan merged commit 5d42cbd into master Nov 21, 2019
@offirgolan offirgolan deleted the upgrade-nock-to-11.x branch November 21, 2019 03:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TypeError: rawRequest.connection.address is not a function
2 participants