-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regression introduced with v0.1.5 with BusyBox v1.22.1 #52
Comments
@peteroreil thanks for reporting this issue, I don't know much about BusyBox but can you clone this project and run test |
Actually need to update this ticket, recently learned (thanks to ps-node I might add) that |
@neekey
I think you can mark this one as can't reproduce. The tests (Test 1 at least) that are failing are due issue #54 which I reported, which looks like is platform specific, Regarding issue #54, the tests pass when I'm running on Ubuntu but BusyBox is not so co-operative. For some reason, the arguments array is shortened when running on BusyBox even though the output from the Thanks |
Hi @peteroreil thanks for all these detailed info, really helps to figure out the issue! So according to your report, my suspicions are:
|
I think there is the same problem on MacOS. |
@neekey I'm sorry, I never seen this reply. :( The version of busybox I was using did not support |
I'm using this library on an Intel Galileo,
Which is running BusyBox v1.22.1 (2015-10-25 11:24:34 GMT) multi-call binary.
When I pass a running
pId
to the lookup function in v0.1.4, theresultList
will return an array withthe running process details.
When I pass a running
pId
to the lookup function in v0.1.5 theresultList
will return an empty array.ps usage options on busybox a.k.a none
ps table fields on BusyBox
PID USER VSZ STAT COMMAND
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: