Fix #1471, Rename confusing SB ENBL/DSBL Route Commands #2190
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
thnkslprpt
force-pushed
the
fix-1471-clarify-enbl-dsbl-route-command-eids
branch
from
45363bf
to
fde8808
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Describe the contribution
CFE_SB_ENBL_RTE?_EIDnaming #1471Testing performed
GitHub CI actions (incl. Build + Run, Unit Tests etc.) all passing successfully.
Expected behavior changes
No impact on behavior (no logic changes).
Better-differentiated EID names will improve code clarity.
Contributor Info
Avi Weiss @thnkslprpt