We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
High level comments / recommendations to be addressed in review:
Function APIs:
p_in_frame
pp_enc_frame
int* len_ingest
TC_t*
SecurityAssociation_t*
uint16_t len_ingest
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Take a look and use "const" where possible
Sorry, something went wrong.
Should we stick with double pointers? Maybe also provide a single pointer option?
jlucas9
szemerick
rjbrown2
dccutrig
No branches or pull requests
High level comments / recommendations to be addressed in review:
Function APIs:
p_in_frame
be a const pointer?pp_enc_frame
double pointer? Is this assumed pre-allocated to maximum length?int* len_ingest
actually be a uint16_t?TC_t*
be used or simply a uint8_t array?SecurityAssociation_t*
or simply providing the uint8_t array and assuming use of an internally stored active TM SPI?uint16_t len_ingest
be a pointer or just passing the actual value across the board for the APIs?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: