You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are also modules named RFM73 and RFM70 that are almost exactly the same as nrf24l01+ chips, could you add support for these modules too when you are modifying the code to support the clones with broked dyn payloads?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possibly, I would have to look into the specific differences, but if somebody already has an idea what they are, that would help a lot.
In RF24Network_Dev, there is a new option: #define ENABLE_DYNAMIC_PAYLOADS which is available for testing of nodes that do not use dynamic payloads. Note: The network does not support mixed nodes. Either they all need to support dynamic_payloads, or all should have it disabled.
This is entirely possible, but it should be disabled by default because there's A LOT of setup code needed which isn't universally the same between RFM70 and RFM73. We had a prospective contribution that came close, but it violated the license of the 3rd party library that the PR patched into a new example (not a native sustainable solution).
There are also modules named RFM73 and RFM70 that are almost exactly the same as nrf24l01+ chips, could you add support for these modules too when you are modifying the code to support the clones with broked dyn payloads?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: