Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(API): Exclude pinned data from workflows #12261

Merged

Conversation

MarcL
Copy link
Contributor

@MarcL MarcL commented Dec 17, 2024

Summary

Adds the ability to exclude pinned data when retrieving workflows via the public API. This can be applied to both the retrieval of all workflows and to the retrieval of a single workflow.

To avoid breaking the existing API contract, a query parameter ?excludePinnedData=true should be added to explicitly exclude the data. By default, it continues to be included.

There was no great approach to excluding the data when making a database query without explicitly creating a select option which includes all data. This would introduce a brittle query that always has to match any changes to the workflow and corresponding joined data. Instead, I've opted to delete the data after retrieval from the DB. Shout if you think there's a better approach.

Related Linear tickets, Github issues, and Community forum posts

Fixes: PAY-2238

Review / Merge checklist

  • PR title and summary are descriptive. (conventions)
  • Docs updated or follow-up ticket created.
  • Tests included.
  • PR Labeled with release/backport (if the PR is an urgent fix that needs to be backported)

@@ -120,6 +121,10 @@ export = {
return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not Found' });
}

if (excludePinnedData) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't have to fix this here, but maybe we should create a tech-debt ticket to remove this at the query level, instead of using delete on the returned data.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created a tech-debt ticket: PAY-2385.

@@ -199,6 +212,12 @@ export = {
...(!config.getEnv('workflowTagsDisabled') && { relations: ['tags'] }),
});

if (excludePinnedData) {
workflows.forEach((workflow) => {
delete workflow.pinData;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team labels Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@MarcL MarcL changed the title feat: Exclude pinned data from workflows feat(API): Exclude pinned data from workflows Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 18, 2024

n8n    Run #8404

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #8404  •  git commit 6479520e67: 🌳 🖥️ browsers:node18.12.0-chrome107 🤖 MarcL 🗃️ e2e/*
Project n8n
Branch Review pay-2238-option-to-exclude-pinned-data-when-getting-all-workflows
Run status status check passed Passed #8404
Run duration 04m 34s
Commit git commit 6479520e67: 🌳 🖥️ browsers:node18.12.0-chrome107 🤖 MarcL 🗃️ e2e/*
Committer Marc Littlemore
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 1
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 480
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed

@MarcL MarcL merged commit e0dc385 into master Dec 19, 2024
56 checks passed
@MarcL MarcL deleted the pay-2238-option-to-exclude-pinned-data-when-getting-all-workflows branch December 19, 2024 08:13
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Dec 19, 2024

Got released with [email protected]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team Released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants