Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: crawler mode without web server #159

Closed
harupong opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #317
Closed

Feature request: crawler mode without web server #159

harupong opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #317
Labels
C-feature-request Category: A feature request

Comments

@harupong
Copy link

I'm using S3 to host files generated by podsync, and it would be great if podsync can be executed like a crawler, which generates the data and then exits.

That way,

  • I can avoid exposing another port of my server to Internet
  • podsync does not need to be running in background all the time (I'll use cron to excute podsync and transfer the data)

I know I can use firewall to block access to the port exposed by podsync, but it's always nice IMHO to have less firewall rules and running-in-background processes.

@mxpv
Copy link
Owner

mxpv commented Jul 25, 2020

Can you describe your use case ? Why not to just use youtube-dl to download data, sounds like better fit.

@mxpv mxpv added C-question Category: Question S-waiting-author Status: Waiting some action from the author labels Jul 25, 2020
@Mrigank11
Copy link

@mxpv We have a similar use-case. Basically, we want to generate podcast feeds using podsync and serve it using existing solutions like S3 or GH pages.

As far as I can see, podsync server simply serves the data directory. It'd be great to make the server optional so that data can be served by other means.

I can send a PR if you wish.

@mxpv
Copy link
Owner

mxpv commented Jul 26, 2020

Sure. Config switch sounds good to me. PRs are always welcome :)

@mxpv mxpv mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2020
6 tasks
@mxpv mxpv added C-feature-request Category: A feature request and removed C-question Category: Question S-waiting-author Status: Waiting some action from the author labels Oct 13, 2020
@mxpv mxpv modified the milestone: 3.0 Jan 2, 2022
@mxpv mxpv closed this as completed in #317 Jun 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-feature-request Category: A feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants