You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've had many other developers call upon my work with, for example, doubles where there should be ints, and vice versa. I'd like to see an enforced type safety mechanism, possibly boxed data types, to prevent this.
Integers, for example, would become... VigilInts.
Any section of code that attempts to coerce a data type is WRONG and must be punished. Casting is acceptable as it allows the caller to acknowledge the risks, but type coercion is unacceptable.
Eternal VigilInts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've had many other developers call upon my work with, for example, doubles where there should be ints, and vice versa. I'd like to see an enforced type safety mechanism, possibly boxed data types, to prevent this.
Integers, for example, would become... VigilInts.
Any section of code that attempts to coerce a data type is WRONG and must be punished. Casting is acceptable as it allows the caller to acknowledge the risks, but type coercion is unacceptable.
Eternal VigilInts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: