Question: should wordwrap support a "hard wrap if needed" option?

[JaredReisinger]

I'm learning bubbletea and lipgloss, and reading a lot of the code because I'm not finding any descriptions about the "box model" (so to speak) that explains how width, padding, border, and margins interact. In doing so, I ran across this code in lipgloss/style.go:

str = wordwrap.String(str, wrapAt)
str = wrap.String(str, wrapAt) // force-wrap long strings

If you have a series of words just longer than the limit, you will get weird, orphaned pieces. For example, wrapping 123456789 123 123456789 123 123456789 123 at length 8 using the above code, the initial wordbreak will leave the length-9 words intact, but add newlines after them, causing the short words to always be on their own lines:

wordwrap    ==> wrap
--------|       --------|   
12345678|9      12345678|  (hard break)  
123     |       9       |
12345678|9      123     |   
123     |       12345678|  (hard break)
12345678|9      9       |
                123     |   
                12345678|  (hard break)
                9       |

If wordbreak had a "hard break if needed", the calling code would just call "wordwrap with hard-breaks", and get:

wordwrap+hard
--------|
12345678|  (hard break)
9 123   |  ("123" fits, soft-wrap afterwards)
12345678|  (hard break)
9 123   |  ("123" fits, soft-wrap afterwards)
12345678|  (hard break)
9

Would that be useful?