Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Mozilla Position on Compression dictionary transport #771

Closed
pmeenan opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Request for Mozilla Position on Compression dictionary transport #771

pmeenan opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@pmeenan
Copy link

pmeenan commented Mar 30, 2023

Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification

Other information

Chrome Status Page: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5124977788977152
Example compression gains over Brotli: https://github.com/WICG/compression-dictionary-transport/blob/main/examples.md

It's still very early in the standards process but it will likely span the IETF HTTP working group and WHATWG HTML and Fetch standards and we wanted to bring the relevant parties together sooner rather than later to hash out the designs.

Compression dictionary transport provides a mechanism for websites to use existing resources in their cache as compression dictionaries for future requests. The key points are:

  • The compression is currently limited to Brotli but the dictionary negotiation is independent of compression protocol.
  • The dictionaries must be same-origin as the resources they compress.
  • The dictionaries and resources they are applied to are required to be cors-readable from the document (side-channel timing attacks make them effectively readable so the requirement makes it explicit).
  • The dictionaries are existing resources in the partitioned caches and cleared when either caches or cookies are cleared.

The flow as it currently stands is (generally):

  • Fetch response for a cacheable resource includes a use-as-dictionary: response header that specifies the path matching rules for fetches where the dictionary would be applied (either for different versions of the same js/css/wasm/etc resource or a path spec for html pages where a stand-alone dictionary would be applied).
  • Future fetches that match the path of a dictionary in cache send a sec-available-dictionary: request header with the hash of the dictionary with the most specific match for the request. It also includes the dictionary compression algorithms it understands. i.e. Accept-Encoding: sbr,....
  • If the server has the requested resource compressed against the dictionary the client advertised (or if it can generate it dynamically), it returns the dictionary-compressed response along with Content-Encoding: sbr and Vary: Accept-Encoding,Sec-Available-Dictionary
@zcorpan
Copy link
Member

zcorpan commented Apr 18, 2023

@valenting

@valenting
Copy link

This looks promising and is definitely worth prototyping.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants