ci: make error message in "🌈 Go Style Check" more readable #678
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: seeflood <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #678 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 60.93% 60.93%
=======================================
Files 120 120
Lines 6384 6384
=======================================
Hits 3890 3890
Misses 2121 2121
Partials 373 373 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
seeflood
changed the title
zhenjunMa
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2022
|
I am going to merge this, ci failed no related to this PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: seeflood [email protected]
What this PR does:
I spent some time telling @dzdx how to fix the CI error in #676 .
It's not cool.
So I think we should make error message in "🌈 Go Style Check" more readable
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: