Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #282 Better document include* and exclude* parameters in AbstractAddThirdPartyMojo #273

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2019
Merged

Conversation

nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor

This PR to explain better include exclude properties for #218

Copy link
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried to improve the wording and sometimes the meaning (not sure I way correct in all cases).

Copy link
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still see some unresolved comments from yesterday. Could you please address them?

* This filter is applied on artifacts gathered as direct dependencies (and
* their transitive) of the projects in the reactor.
* <p>
* By default if an artifact is being excluded its transitive dependencies
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove "being"

* or {@code -Dlicense.includedScopes=test,provided}.
* <p>
* This filter is applied on artifacts gathered as direct dependencies (and
* their transitive) of the projects in the reactor.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add "dependencies" after "transitive"

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

done

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

ppalaga commented Feb 21, 2019

done

I still see unresolved comments from yesterday, e.g. here 404d41a#r258679848 and here 404d41a#r258680088

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

done

I still see unresolved comments from yesterday, e.g. here 404d41a#r258679848 and here 404d41a#r258680088

For Remove "being" and "Add "dependencies" after "transitive"" are just single comment without review so I can not mark them as "Resolve conversation"

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

ppalaga commented Feb 21, 2019

For Remove "being" and "Add "dependencies" after "transitive"" are just single comment without review so I can not mark them as "Resolve conversation"

I do not care for the status of my comments. The issues in code need to get addressed. I can still see 3 occurrences of "is being" in the file. Similar for "transitive)" and perhaps others. Please go through the comments and make sure they are either fixed or insist on your text if you think I am wrong.

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have removed any "is being" and "transitive" +" dependencies" in the javadoc

Copy link
Contributor

@ppalaga ppalaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nfalco79 I have sent a PR against your branch https://github.com/nfalco79/license-maven-plugin/pull/1 that you may want to review and eventually amend to your commit.

Please reword your commit message to Fix #282 Better document include* and exclude* parameters in AbstractAddThirdPartyMojo

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

nfalco79 commented Feb 22, 2019

good, seems the fastest solution. Thank you

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let me reword commit

@ppalaga
Copy link
Contributor

ppalaga commented Feb 22, 2019

I'd prefer to have only one commit here. Could you please squash the two into one and change the commit message to Fix #282 Better document include* and exclude* parameters in AbstractAddThirdPartyMojo ?

@nfalco79
Copy link
Contributor Author

nfalco79 commented Feb 22, 2019

Squashed

@ppalaga ppalaga changed the title Add more javadoc for include/exclude properties. Fix #282 Better document include* and exclude* parameters in AbstractAddThirdPartyMojo Feb 22, 2019
@ppalaga ppalaga merged commit efe1bfc into mojohaus:master Feb 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants