Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade jsdiff to v1.4.0 #1699

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2015
Merged

Conversation

nylen
Copy link
Contributor

@nylen nylen commented May 13, 2015

jsdiff v1.4.0 contains a fix for kpdecker/jsdiff#14. Upgrading will display multi-line diffs in the same standard order as diff, git, etc:

- actual / removed
+ expected / added

The current order is unintuitive which makes it harder to read at a glance:

+ expected / added
- actual / removed

Supersedes #1647. cc @danielstjules @boneskull

The new version of jsdiff reverses the + and - diff line order to the
standard order used by git, diff, etc.  Tests updated accordingly.
@nylen nylen force-pushed the upgrade/jsdiff branch from 46211c0 to 9a0794a Compare May 13, 2015 16:52
@dasilvacontin
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thanks @nylen!

dasilvacontin added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2015
@dasilvacontin dasilvacontin merged commit e5f1180 into mochajs:master May 13, 2015
@danielstjules
Copy link
Contributor

👏 :)

@nylen
Copy link
Contributor Author

nylen commented May 14, 2015

Thanks!! Can we get a new version?

@dasilvacontin
Copy link
Contributor

There are ~5 fixes waiting in master. A patch release would be appropriate.

/cc @travisjeffery @boneskull

@travisjeffery
Copy link
Contributor

ok gonna make a release right now

@travisjeffery
Copy link
Contributor

💥 done, thanks all!

@dasilvacontin
Copy link
Contributor

kudos @travisjeffery! :D

@nylen nylen deleted the upgrade/jsdiff branch June 25, 2018 02:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants