Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

About the performance of SMPL values of Human3.6M dataset #102

Open
Ironbrotherstyle opened this issue Jan 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

About the performance of SMPL values of Human3.6M dataset #102

Ironbrotherstyle opened this issue Jan 10, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Ironbrotherstyle
Copy link

Ironbrotherstyle commented Jan 10, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Thank you for sharing your great work. I have been working on making my own dataset with 3D
joints and SMPL parameters. The data provided by you link is impressive. However, I am not sure if the provided data used 3D joints in training as your new paper are based on that. Did the data provided by you link1 link2 use 3D joints? The question is coming from the phenomenon that my try on Smplify-X with 2D supervision dose not show performance as yours.
@mks0601
Copy link
Owner

mks0601 commented Jan 11, 2022

Yes I ran SMPLify-X on GT 3D joints.

@Ironbrotherstyle
Copy link
Author

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mks0601 @Ironbrotherstyle