Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Outdated web response #248

Open
ZainGithub12 opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Outdated web response #248

ZainGithub12 opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ZainGithub12
Copy link

ZainGithub12 commented Jun 29, 2024

Screenshot_20240629_123112_Chrome.jpg

The free version of ChatGPT that has limited access to real-time data and current events is GPT-4o, not GPT-3.5. The reason this happened is because it got a source from PCMag in January 2024. So the source is a bit outdated.

The outdated response happens with some other queries too, but this is one example. Can you fix this issue?

@miurla
Copy link
Owner

miurla commented Jun 29, 2024

At the time of the search, it's not possible to determine if the information is outdated, so the LLM needs to select and respond with the appropriate information. It seems necessary to handle multiple queries by searching for them. I'll consider how to handle it.

I tested the query "The free version of ChatGPT" with the two models, Quality (GPT & Claude). In both cases, I received responses from GPT-4o: https://www.morphic.sh/share/Z9qauZu

image

@ZainGithub12
If possible, I'd like you to write it using the Issue template. I want to know the steps to reproduce the issue. In this description, I don't know which model you used or what the query was.

@ZainGithub12
Copy link
Author

ZainGithub12 commented Jun 29, 2024

I used (Quality) GPT-4o, and this is my query:
Screenshot_20240629_141636_Chrome.jpg

@miurla miurla added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants