You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I were to contribute a impl TryFrom<&str> for GUID as a pull request, would that be welcomed?
The current impl From<&str> for GUID causes panics on invalid GUID strings which I would like to avoid.
If the windows-rs team does not yet want to introduce Result types, then I'd also be okay with a function that returns Option<GUID>—I'm don't necessarily need a function that returns a Result.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@kennykerr is there documentation on the cadence for which the repo publishes to crates.io. Been hoping to use this for a while but noticed we're still at 0.58.0 on crates.io https://crates.io/crates/windows/versions
Crates are published as needed to avoid version churn. So there won't be a release unless there's a specific need or request for a specific crate to be updated. Generally developers will test against the repo and when they themselves are ready to publish they will then request a release.
A good example is today's 0.60.0 release that was requested by rustup after much validation.
Suggestion
Dear
windows-rs
team,If I were to contribute a
impl TryFrom<&str> for GUID
as a pull request, would that be welcomed?The current
impl From<&str> for GUID
causes panics on invalid GUID strings which I would like to avoid.If the
windows-rs
team does not yet want to introduceResult
types, then I'd also be okay with a function that returnsOption<GUID>
—I'm don't necessarily need a function that returns aResult
.Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: