You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During November we want to improve our issue management. As a first step we will review the assigned issues. During the review pass please make sure to:
close obsolete/fixed issues
each issue needs a type label, that is one of: Bug, Feature-Request, Debt, Needs more Info, Question, Under-Discussion, upstream:
Bug - the implementation of a feature is not correct
Feature-Request - request to change the proper implementation of a feature or a request for a new feature that needs to be implemented.
Under Discussion - not decided whether the issue is a bug or feature
Debt - improve the implementation/architecture
Needs more info - not possible to assing a type label due to missing information
Question - we should direct questions to SO
upstream - an issue used to track an issue in an upstream component
Note: All type labels are grey (Bugs grey with a touch of red).
Here is my template for closing issues that are out of scope:
This feature request will not be considered in the next 6-12 months roadmap and as such will be closed to keep the number of issues we have to maintain actionable. Thanks for understanding and happy coding!
During November we want to improve our issue management. As a first step we will review the assigned issues. During the review pass please make sure to:
Bug
,Feature-Request
,Debt
,Needs more Info
,Question
,Under-Discussion
,upstream
:important
label to issues thathelp-wanted
extensions-candidate
and be closedTracking:
Please make sure that you also do this grooming in our satellite repositories:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: