Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request] Support for low-latency remote development #24068

Closed
vandop opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

[Feature Request] Support for low-latency remote development #24068

vandop opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
*duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s) feature-request Request for new features or functionality

Comments

@vandop
Copy link

vandop commented Apr 6, 2017

Hi,

Common scenario is to have my workstation in my office, but when travelling or working from home, I would like to have a low latency editing experience. Today I do it through RDP what is quite slow...

Facebook engineers seem to be pretty happy with Nuclide approach:
https://nuclide.io/docs/features/remote/

Thanks
@chrmarti chrmarti added the feature-request Request for new features or functionality label Apr 6, 2017
@bpasero bpasero removed their assignment Apr 7, 2017
@pwwang
Copy link

pwwang commented Jun 5, 2017

+1

@mjbvz mjbvz added the *duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s) label Nov 9, 2017
@mjbvz
Copy link
Collaborator

mjbvz commented Nov 9, 2017

Duplicate of #29194

@mjbvz mjbvz marked this as a duplicate of #29194 Nov 9, 2017
@mjbvz mjbvz closed this as completed Nov 9, 2017
@vscodebot vscodebot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 24, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
*duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s) feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@bpasero @pwwang @vandop @chrmarti @mjbvz