You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
The change in #1023 (released in 0.6.62) to use "go vet" instead of "go tool vet" has broken the ability to use "go.vetFlags".
"go vet" fails silently in the Output tab (and not code is actually vetted) if "go.vetFlags" are defined as per the example for the flag: "go.vetFlags": ["-all", "-shadow"]
Per the "go vet" command: To run the vet tool with specific options, run 'go tool vet'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
seanpfeifer
changed the title
"go.vetFlags" fails to vet code in 0.6.62 by PR #1023
"go.vetFlags" fails to vet code in 0.6.62
Jul 10, 2017
The change in #1023 (released in 0.6.62) to use "go vet" instead of "go tool vet" has broken the ability to use "go.vetFlags".
"go vet" fails silently in the Output tab (and not code is actually vetted) if "go.vetFlags" are defined as per the example for the flag:
"go.vetFlags": ["-all", "-shadow"]
Per the "go vet" command:
To run the vet tool with specific options, run 'go tool vet'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: