You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
I tested type test already written by someone.
but the test looked like all passed(it didn't show anything) even I wrote wrong type like the code.
result.expectTypeToBeString // $expectType number
I found the miss spell ($e -> $E) and fixed it, the test failed as I expected.
I think it could be much better if there was feedback about the miss-spell
so I suggest these... how do you think?
suggestions
to show test result even if passed
or to make $expectType also availalbe
or to guide about miss spell like got $expectType, do you mean $ExpectType?
thank you! 😊
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
roseline124
changed the title
making both $expectType and $ExpectType available
feedback about miss spell of $ExpectType
May 20, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Good Day~ 😊
background
I tested type test already written by someone.
but the test looked like all passed(it didn't show anything) even I wrote wrong type like the code.
I found the miss spell ($e -> $E) and fixed it, the test failed as I expected.
I think it could be much better if there was feedback about the miss-spell
so I suggest these... how do you think?
suggestions
got $expectType, do you mean $ExpectType?
thank you! 😊
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: