You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find that the resolution possibly implies that T may be cv-qualified. Currently MSVC STL only treats cv-unqualified pair types as such specializations, while libstdc++ admits both unqualified and const-qualified (but not volatile-qualified) pair types.
Is another LWG issue needed?
LWG has a bad habit of sometimes saying "specialization of meow" when they really intend "cv-qualified specialization of meow". I've asked for clarification, and will open an issue if necessary.
LWG-3525
uses_allocator_construction_args
fails to handle types convertible topair
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: