Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi @sonichi:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
13 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi Team FLAML:
I have a few general questions regarding FLAML:
Could I use a customized learner for the ensemble? For example, for a linear combination, I want to make sure all the coefficients are negative.
I noticed that the search of automl is much more biased when running distributedly on compute clusters, which means that it focuses much more on 'strong' learners. For example, this is the summary from my recent search:
Obviously FLAML spent the majority of time on LearnerE, which is the optimal one; it is understandable, however, the distribution of attempts on different learners is much more balanced when running FLAML on a VM. Could you explain this phenomenon, please? Usually we use FLAML not just to look for the overall optimal solution, but also the best result per learner.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions