Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No ‘Access Tier’ column displays for one attached blob container with SAS #160

Closed
v-xuanzh opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
🧪 testing Found through regular testing ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged
Milestone

Comments

@v-xuanzh
Copy link

v-xuanzh commented May 9, 2018

Storage Explorer Version: 1.1.0 RC

Platform: Windows/Linux/Mac

Architecture: ia32/x64

Build Number: 20180507.1

Commit: bcc8990d

Regression From: Not a regression

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Launch Storage Explorer and expand a blob account.
  2. Set the default Access Tier for the account.
  3. Create one blob container and upload a blob to it.
  4. Attach this blob container with SAS and make sure it is opened.
  5. Check whether ‘Access Tier’ column displays or not on the attached blob container.

Expected Experience:

‘Access Tier’ column displays on the attached blob container.

Actual Experience:

No ‘Access Tier’ column displays for attached blob container with SAS.

tier

More info:

  1. ‘Access Tier’ displays well on the blob 'Properties' dialog.
  2. This issue also reproduces for one blob container which is added to Quick Access.
@v-xuanzh v-xuanzh added the 🧪 testing Found through regular testing label May 9, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 10, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged and removed pending labels May 30, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT
Copy link
Member

Merged into master for 1.2.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧪 testing Found through regular testing ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants