From e5f32c4494bdcb61f0ecc51e4797bf549122389a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Donnay Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:51:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix label link --- paper/paper.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/paper/paper.md b/paper/paper.md index eff21d9..6b8d50f 100644 --- a/paper/paper.md +++ b/paper/paper.md @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Reform advocates also need to describe voting mechanisms and their likely outcomes effectively to members of their communities. The end-to-end pipeline provided by `VoteKit` allows advocates to toggle different system settings and compare expected outcomes. For example, Figure \ref(WA_comparison) comes from a report on reform proposals for the chambers of the Washington state legislature, with Systems 0-3 as paired bicameral systems and Systems 4-5 as unicameral solutions. Using the codebase that formed the foundation of `VoteKit`, researchers compared the expected outcomes for minority representation under these six systems. -![A comparison of a variety of electoral systems and their affect on minority representation in a case study of the Washington state legislature [@washington_leg]. []{label="WA_comparison"}](./figures/WA_poc_seats_chartsystem_compare_pared.png){width=100%} +![A comparison of a variety of electoral systems and their affect on minority representation in a case study of the Washington state legislature [@washington_leg]. {label="WA_comparison"}](./figures/WA_poc_seats_chartsystem_compare_pared.png){width=100%} ## Area of need: Resources for research