Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EMEP output #85

Open
janamol opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

EMEP output #85

janamol opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@janamol
Copy link

janamol commented Apr 14, 2021

Hi, I have a question about how to set up the model output. I have found some answers in issue #48 but would like to confirm:
NH4 seems to be present only in the fine-mode particles NH4_F, no NH4_C is that correct?
I need to output PM2.5 and PM10 not including the associated water. Studying the Simpson et al., 2012 paper, I was not sure if PMFINE, PMCO and PM10 are with or without water but from comment in #48 I have concluded that these should be without the associated water as there are listed the same parameters with _RH50 in the name which looks like the conditions for calculation of the PM-associated water described in Simpson et al., 2012.
In the config_emep.nml which comes with rv4.34, in OutputConcs PMFINE is output both in 'ug' and in 'ug_PM'. What is the difference? Looks like it is OM25, OMCOARSE, ASOA and BSOA also using both the ug_PM and ug outputs, somewhere I have read that in that case ug includes semivolatiles in the gas phase while ug_PM only include the particulate-phase organics. Would it be the same case for PMFINE?

@svetlanat
Copy link

Hi, I hope those answers will be useful:

  1. Correct. NH4 is only present in the fine fraction (NH4_F)
  2. PMFINE, PMCO and PM10 are dry mass (without water), and so is SURF_ug_PM25 (which is = PMFINE+0.27*NO3_C)
  3. PMFINE in 'ug' is fine to use. You are right about 'ug' (gas+particles) and 'ug_PM' (only particles) for semi-volatile organics, but I'm not sure if this is the case for PMFINE'.
    @mifads Dave, could you clarify PMFINE in 'ug_PM'

@janamol
Copy link
Author

janamol commented Apr 19, 2021 via email

@mifads
Copy link
Contributor

mifads commented Apr 20, 2021

Hi Svetlana, Jana,

   @mifads Dave, could you clarify PMFINE in 'ug_PM'

PMFINE uses "OM25_p" (see CM_ChemGroups_mod), which is the particulate sum of OM species. So, no gas-phase.

@janamol
Copy link
Author

janamol commented Apr 20, 2021

Hi Dave,
Thanks! Just to doublecheck, does it mean that PMFINE in ‘ug’ and in ‘ug_PM’ is the same?

@mifads
Copy link
Contributor

mifads commented Apr 20, 2021

Hi Jana,

Yes, PMFINE is special that way. Confusing I know!

@svetlanat
Copy link

Hi Jana,

Regarding SURF_ug_PM25, we assume that a fraction of coarse NO3 (if you imagine a log-normal distribution) will be in particles smaller than 2.5 mkm.

Svetlana

@janamol
Copy link
Author

janamol commented Apr 20, 2021

Thanks Svetlana, I have found Table 6 in Simpson et al., 2012 now, that explains it. Best regards /Jana

@janamol
Copy link
Author

janamol commented Apr 20, 2021

One more question regarding the organic part, if I may. Do I understand this correctly?:
'OM25' 'ugC_PM' is OC, only the particulate phase
'OM25' 'ugC' is OC, particulate + semi-volatile phase (if this unit exists)
'OM25' 'ug_PM' is OM (=~OC*1.3) only the particulate phase
'OM25' 'ug_PM' is OM, particulate + semi-volatile phase

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants