You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a feedback session Jason Moore mentioned that there are standards with biomechanical modeling on how to orient reference frames w.r.t. the body and that it would be better to follow those within BRiM even though the current orientation, which follows the bicycle convention, has other practical advantages. Overall, I agree with him on this point. The fix should not be to difficult as it is just a rotation about the X-axis of 180 degrees. However, special attention is required to make sure no mistakes also in the automatic parameterization are made.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In a feedback session Jason Moore mentioned that there are standards with biomechanical modeling on how to orient reference frames w.r.t. the body and that it would be better to follow those within BRiM even though the current orientation, which follows the bicycle convention, has other practical advantages. Overall, I agree with him on this point. The fix should not be to difficult as it is just a rotation about the X-axis of 180 degrees. However, special attention is required to make sure no mistakes also in the automatic parameterization are made.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: