Glossary - just use See Also section?

[hamishwillee]

Glossary page template has an additional info section that looks like this:

Seems like an unhelpful and inconsistent distinction. As I'm in there anyway removing the "Quicklinks" sections , any objection to me just making the standard section for all Glossary items be "See also"?

Nothing against people providing more refined sub headings, but I think they are unlikely to be necessary in the majority of cases.

@wbamberg @teoli2003

[wbamberg]

I'm in favour of this, for sure! I think I might have had the same thought recently but didn't manage to hold onto it :).

[hamishwillee]

Great! Just FYI, the current plan is that the Glossary sidebar will be auto-generated without any input from the page (probably as the entire glossary, nested under heading A, B, C ..

[hamishwillee]

FYI PR here: mdn/content#9079